Speaker
Joey Gilkey
CEO at TitanX

On a mission to eliminate the SDR headcount arms race.

Subscribe to newsletter

You're used to looking for the least expensive contact data.

And that makes sense because mere contact data (name, phone number, title, email, current company) is a commodity.

There is near zero differentiation between the major contact data providers on the market, so they compete on price.

But if you think what TitanX offers is expensive, that's because you don't quite understand Phone Intent is... yet. And why it's not apples-to-apples with contact data.

So we'll lay the math out for you.

We'll look at the cost-per result across your full funnel, taking everything into account: rep fully loaded cost, cost per conversation, cost per meeting, cost per opportunity, and cost per closed deal...

And show exactly how TitanX cuts your CAC in half.

Most teams never run this math.

They see TitanX on a budget line and call it "expensive". What they're not seeing is what the status quo is already costing them at every stage of the funnel. We're going to change that.

Here's what we cover:

  • How connect rate affects your CAC
  • The cost-per-outcome math of baseline, status-quo performance without TitanX
  • The cost/closed-won deal with TitanX and 25% connect rates
  • How better connect rates can triple deal velocity on a per-rep basis
  • What bad data actually costs you due to waste in your system

The real question: is TitanX expensive, or is the status quo?